From what I’ve researched and seen in personal experiences, muscle-selective SARMs are usually considered the best for lean tissue growth because they show high relative selectivity for muscle over other tissues, which tends to limit androgenic side effects. This selectivity is crucial because it helps users focus the anabolic effects primarily where it counts without affecting other sensitive tissues as much. Dual-action SARMs, which combine muscle and bone selectivity, can offer a more balanced approach but sometimes trade off the degree of lean growth for broader effects. You can get more info about these differences by diving into resources that explain the mechanisms and comparative profiles in detail this website offers a good breakdown. People also often talk about the importance of dosage and cycling, especially to maximize results while managing risks. Overall, the consensus leans toward muscle-selective SARMs being optimal for anyone specifically seeking lean muscle growth, but understand your own body’s reaction is key. It’s always wise to research and test carefully.